RESUMO
INTRODUCCIÓN: Este trabajo pretende analizar el conocimiento del especialista en Otorrinolaringología en España sobre los criterios de indicación de los implantes cocleares (IC) y, según los resultados, considerar si es necesario implementar medidas de formación dirigidas a mejorar el conocimiento en esta área. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se diseña un cuestionario dirigido a conocer el nivel de conocimiento sobre la indicación de IC en personas con hipoacusia. Este cuestionario recogía información demográfica de los encuestados y conocimientos sobre aspectos como indicaciones convencionales y emergentes de los IC, características técnicas de los IC y resultados en la población implantada. RESULTADOS: Un total de 222 especialistas españoles en Otorrinolaringología respondieron el cuestionario (10,29% de la muestra encuestada). CONCLUSIONES: Un 50% de los encuestados mostraron unos conocimientos medios-altos sobre IC. Datos epidemiológicos sugieren que un alto porcentaje de adultos con sorderas poslocutivas candidatos a un IC no son referidos para tratamiento. El desconocimiento de los criterios para la indicación de IC por parte de los especialistas en Otorrinolaringología puede contribuir a una inadecuada orientación de los pacientes potencialmente candidatos a un IC. Las mayores deficiencias se encontraron en las indicaciones más emergentes de un IC. Dentro de los profesionales de la Otorrinolaringología los mayores conocimientos sobre IC se concentraron en aquellos que trabajaban en hospitales terciarios, especializados en Otología y Otoneurología, y desempeñaban su actividad laboral en el sector público y privado. Este estudio sugiere la conveniencia de incrementar acciones formativas sobre IC en los profesionales de la Otorrinolaringología, especialmente para otorrinolaringólogos generales
INTRODUCTION: This study aims to analyse the knowledge of cochlear implant (CI) candidacy criteria of otorhinolaryngology specialists in Spain, and from the results, consider whether it is necessary to implement training measures aimed at improving knowledge in this area. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A questionnaire was designed for measuring the level of knowledge of cochlear implant candidacy criteria (CI) in people with hearing loss. The questionnaire collected the demographic data of the respondents and their knowledge on the conventional and emergency indications for CI, technical characteristics of CI and results in the implanted population. RESULTS: A total of 222 Spanish specialists in otorhinolaryngology answered the questionnaire (10.29% of the sample surveyed). CONCLUSIONS: The 50% of all respondents showed a medium-high knowledge about CI. Epidemiological data suggest that a high percentage of adults with postlocutive deafness and candidates for a CI are not referred for treatment. The lack of knowledge about the criteria for the indication of CI by otorhinolaryngology specialists may contribute to inadequate guidance of patients who are potential candidates for CI. The greatest shortcomings are found in the most emergency indications for a CI. Among otorhinolaryngology professionals, the greatest knowledge about CI is found in those who work in tertiary hospitals in the areas of otology and otoneurology, either in the public or private sector. This study suggests that training on CI should be increased for otorhinolaryngology professionals, especially for general otorhinolaryngologists
Assuntos
Humanos , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Implantes Cocleares , Autorrelato , Perda Auditiva/cirurgia , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Otolaringologia , EspanhaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: This study aims to analyse the knowledge of cochlear implant (CI) candidacy criteria of otorhinolaryngology specialists in Spain, and from the results, consider whether it is necessary to implement training measures aimed at improving knowledge in this area. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A questionnaire was designed for measuring the level of knowledge of cochlear implant candidacy criteria (CI) in people with hearing loss. The questionnaire collected the demographic data of the respondents and their knowledge on the conventional and emergency indications for CI, technical characteristics of CI and results in the implanted population. RESULTS: A total of 222 Spanish specialists in otorhinolaryngology answered the questionnaire (10.29% of the sample surveyed). CONCLUSIONS: The 50% of all respondents showed a medium-high knowledge about CI. Epidemiological data suggest that a high percentage of adults with postlocutive deafness and candidates for a CI are not referred for treatment. The lack of knowledge about the criteria for the indication of CI by otorhinolaryngology specialists may contribute to inadequate guidance of patients who are potential candidates for CI. The greatest shortcomings are found in the most emergency indications for a CI. Among otorhinolaryngology professionals, the greatest knowledge about CI is found in those who work in tertiary hospitals in the areas of otology and otoneurology, either in the public or private sector. This study suggests that training on CI should be increased for otorhinolaryngology professionals, especially for general otorhinolaryngologists.
